<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Movie Hawk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moviehawk.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moviehawk.net</link>
	<description>Sporadic ramblings on pop phenomena.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Black Swan by Jeff Martin</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2011/01/27/review-black-swan/comment-page-1/#comment-105233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/?p=550#comment-105233</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t disagree with some of your problems with the movie, Andrew. I think the script was a little underdeveloped, particularly in outlining the mother&#039;s motivations. I don&#039;t think it belongs in Best Picture conversations either (the tag is there to group it with the other nominees), but I think the execution of the spookiness, especially in the third act, was great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with some of your problems with the movie, Andrew. I think the script was a little underdeveloped, particularly in outlining the mother&#8217;s motivations. I don&#8217;t think it belongs in Best Picture conversations either (the tag is there to group it with the other nominees), but I think the execution of the spookiness, especially in the third act, was great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Black Swan by AP</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2011/01/27/review-black-swan/comment-page-1/#comment-105232</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/?p=550#comment-105232</guid>
		<description>I dunno.  I have to disagree with you here.  A bit, anyway.  

The issues I took with the film had more to do with the script and storyline than the actual direction.  Aronofsky has managed to jump from genre to genre reasonably well - bringing his own specific style along with him.  Like Danny Boyle used to do... back when he had an imagination.  The whole film was spooky and, like you said, &quot;maddening.&quot;  Well done, there.

But the overall idea of it?  The tired, vaguely sexist subdivision of a woman&#039;s sexuality down to whore or virgin?  The film as a parable of a woman&#039;s desperate attempt to attain a sense of perfection, whether in the eyes of men or family or their profession?  I don&#039;t mean to sound insensitive here... but do we really need another movie that does this?  And in such unimaginative terms (see: the overuse of black and white imagery to the point of near-parody)?  

I&#039;m being a bit harsh here.  I don&#039;t mean to be.  I thought the movie was alright.  Spooky and entertaining.  And, to be frank, I&#039;d watch Mila Kunis do pretty much anything (pay her taxes, eat soup, clip her toenails).  But is this movie an improvement upon his previous work?  No, I don&#039;t think so.  In fact, I think it&#039;s disappointing when you consider how good some of his earlier films were.  

Totally not a best picture.  In my opinion, anyway.

But, then again, I don&#039;t support almost all of the nominations for Best Picture this year.  Or any year, for that matter.  

&lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno.  I have to disagree with you here.  A bit, anyway.  </p>
<p>The issues I took with the film had more to do with the script and storyline than the actual direction.  Aronofsky has managed to jump from genre to genre reasonably well &#8211; bringing his own specific style along with him.  Like Danny Boyle used to do&#8230; back when he had an imagination.  The whole film was spooky and, like you said, &#8220;maddening.&#8221;  Well done, there.</p>
<p>But the overall idea of it?  The tired, vaguely sexist subdivision of a woman&#8217;s sexuality down to whore or virgin?  The film as a parable of a woman&#8217;s desperate attempt to attain a sense of perfection, whether in the eyes of men or family or their profession?  I don&#8217;t mean to sound insensitive here&#8230; but do we really need another movie that does this?  And in such unimaginative terms (see: the overuse of black and white imagery to the point of near-parody)?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m being a bit harsh here.  I don&#8217;t mean to be.  I thought the movie was alright.  Spooky and entertaining.  And, to be frank, I&#8217;d watch Mila Kunis do pretty much anything (pay her taxes, eat soup, clip her toenails).  But is this movie an improvement upon his previous work?  No, I don&#8217;t think so.  In fact, I think it&#8217;s disappointing when you consider how good some of his earlier films were.  </p>
<p>Totally not a best picture.  In my opinion, anyway.</p>
<p>But, then again, I don&#8217;t support almost all of the nominations for Best Picture this year.  Or any year, for that matter.  </p>
<p>&lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Need Something Stronger than Champagne by Laura G</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2010/03/22/i-need-something-stronger-than-champagne/comment-page-1/#comment-86140</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/?p=263#comment-86140</guid>
		<description>Jeff is back!  Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff is back!  Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zack Attack by Vagrant Jack</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2008/11/04/zack-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-83082</link>
		<dc:creator>Vagrant Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/?p=261#comment-83082</guid>
		<description>Definitely agree........ not Smith&#039;s best work!  I like the site though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely agree&#8230;&#8230;.. not Smith&#8217;s best work!  I like the site though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not a Leg to Stand On by Fatma</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2006/10/27/not-a-leg-to-stand-on/comment-page-1/#comment-82792</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/2006/10/27/not-a-leg-to-stand-on/#comment-82792</guid>
		<description>OMG!! Hahahaha I ABSOLUTELY LOVED T when tyler and james fought with the umm &#039;single mums&#039; !! HAHAHA i thouht it was HILARIOUS!! .. and I actually enjoyed watching the roadblock where they had to climb the towers ?!! .. and why does he always give her the &#039;physical&#039; roadblocks?!! Doesnt he understand her condition or was he too selfish to do it himself?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG!! Hahahaha I ABSOLUTELY LOVED T when tyler and james fought with the umm &#8216;single mums&#8217; !! HAHAHA i thouht it was HILARIOUS!! .. and I actually enjoyed watching the roadblock where they had to climb the towers ?!! .. and why does he always give her the &#8216;physical&#8217; roadblocks?!! Doesnt he understand her condition or was he too selfish to do it himself?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Prime Time by Ross</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2007/07/05/prime-time/comment-page-1/#comment-82757</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/2007/07/05/prime-time/#comment-82757</guid>
		<description>Lets get serious here for a sec, yes the acting sucked and plot was not deep but what reason did you really go to see this movie? Be it for nastalgia or just to see what type of movie it can i think it delivered exactly what it was supposed to be, AN ACTION FLICK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets get serious here for a sec, yes the acting sucked and plot was not deep but what reason did you really go to see this movie? Be it for nastalgia or just to see what type of movie it can i think it delivered exactly what it was supposed to be, AN ACTION FLICK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zack Attack by Satan</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2008/11/04/zack-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-54125</link>
		<dc:creator>Satan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/?p=261#comment-54125</guid>
		<description>Dear Jeff thanks a lot I was just starting to get used to the heat down here and then you go and update the website.  You will be hearing from my lawyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jeff thanks a lot I was just starting to get used to the heat down here and then you go and update the website.  You will be hearing from my lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AFI Lists Will Never Get Old by independentminded</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2006/09/05/afi-lists-will-never-get-old/comment-page-1/#comment-53838</link>
		<dc:creator>independentminded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/2006/09/05/afi-lists-will-never-get-old/#comment-53838</guid>
		<description>Glad to see that West Side Story is on the AFI&#039;s list of the 25 Greatest movie Musicals.  Can&#039;t wait for the day that WSS makes numero uno on the list!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see that West Side Story is on the AFI&#8217;s list of the 25 Greatest movie Musicals.  Can&#8217;t wait for the day that WSS makes numero uno on the list!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seeing Red by mabisa</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2008/06/03/seeing-red/comment-page-1/#comment-48053</link>
		<dc:creator>mabisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/2008/06/03/seeing-red/#comment-48053</guid>
		<description>While I don&#039;t consider myself a Pinkerton purist per say, I think I was young and impressionable enough when it was still a fresh album that I still hold it close and dear. It&#039;s too difficult to detach my own nostalgia from their music to truly compare the first two albums to the last four, and yet I cannot shake a feeling that Rivers has been calling it in for some time now. Cursory listens to their post-Pinkerton work had failed to pique my interest at all. I appreciate your review, however, and respect the attempt to do more than just wave the band away as commonfolk powerpop. I had no intentions of listening to the Red Album, perhaps I will now give it a listen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#8217;t consider myself a Pinkerton purist per say, I think I was young and impressionable enough when it was still a fresh album that I still hold it close and dear. It&#8217;s too difficult to detach my own nostalgia from their music to truly compare the first two albums to the last four, and yet I cannot shake a feeling that Rivers has been calling it in for some time now. Cursory listens to their post-Pinkerton work had failed to pique my interest at all. I appreciate your review, however, and respect the attempt to do more than just wave the band away as commonfolk powerpop. I had no intentions of listening to the Red Album, perhaps I will now give it a listen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seeing Red by Laura G</title>
		<link>http://moviehawk.net/2008/06/03/seeing-red/comment-page-1/#comment-46168</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviehawk.net/2008/06/03/seeing-red/#comment-46168</guid>
		<description>Hey. I just wanted to let you know I nominated this blog for an award. Enjoy!

http://reviewingwhatever.blogspot.com/2008/07/award-meme.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey. I just wanted to let you know I nominated this blog for an award. Enjoy!</p>
<p><a href="http://reviewingwhatever.blogspot.com/2008/07/award-meme.html" rel="nofollow">http://reviewingwhatever.blogspot.com/2008/07/award-meme.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

